October 2, 2022
Chicago 12, Melborne City, USA

With the Clock Running Out, Humans Need to Rethink Time Itself


Another day, another day Deadline: To limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, greenhouse gas emissions must remain at the top “last before 2025”, according to the most recent intergovernmental panel on climate change. This is how we live now – not in the last days of the Bible, but in the words of the twentieth-century German Jewish philosopher Gunther Anders, a permanent “end.” Between the prospect of nuclear war and the advancement of climate change, a distinct secular catastrophe for at least 70 years always seems to be near the corner. Time itself is one of its victims.

Take a look around: The mega-droughts, wildfires, and category-busting hurricanes we see today are the result of past emissions একটি a ghostly fog in the carbon cycle. The intense stress of the Covid-19 epidemic slows down time for some, speeds things up for others – both normal responses, psychologists say, to the immense stress of lockdown. News of the war in Ukraine, which may once reach the morning paper or the night program, is broadcast 24/7 through our screens. And TikTok trends move at the speed of a micro-video, with fast fashion and even fast furniture dragging along. Everywhere, the past, present and future are intertwined.

According to German statesman Hartmut Rosa, the game has been called speed since the Industrial Revolution. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. For centuries, Westerners have bought into the narrative that “through economic growth we can live a prosperous, free life through material scarcity, lack of time through rapid technology, and change in science and politics,” he said in 2015. More labor, more cost, more everything packed. Yet the more we chat, the more those experiences are recorded in our minds and memories, leading to a feeling of deep isolation.

Now, time is not just accelerated; For many, the future also looks predictable. In a 2021 survey of more than 10,000 young people in 10 countries, more than half agreed that “humanity has been destroyed” and many described the feeling that they have no future. Personalized “environmental concerns” and “climate misery”, though real and powerful, are not the only consequence of this change of pace. It is a modern liberal democracy that struggles to hold its own and to imagine a future for everyone. What citizens do with their changing relationships over time is sure to have a profound effect on governments around the world.

The concept of time Human history has changed dramatically, from circular to linear, from religious to secular. But the “scientific” time, the period of modernity, capitalism, and liberal democracy, moving the arrow of time forward at a regimental pace, based on a traditional Newtonian concept. Although recent physics research has challenged this premise, “clock time” is still used to shape our electoral cycle, imprisonment, immigration policy, and more, says political philosopher Elizabeth Cohen. The political value of time. In this context, time is not an inert substance, but the soil from which democracy is born.

Although many rich countries are increasingly post-clockwise. Instead, people’s daily lives are run on “network time,” says Robert Hassan, professor and author of media and communications at the University of Melbourne. Empire of speed. Since the 1960s, network computing, which has made everything from social media to zoom calls possible, has allowed a kind of connection that breaks down both space and time. As a result, democratic politics seems to be extremely slow in relation to the pace of trade and culture, and the dual identity of the people as citizens and consumers becomes more and more divisive.

One reason for the itch to move quickly in politics could be 40 percent of Americans 54 54 percent of Republicans surveyed and 31 percent of Democrats বলেছেন say they would support a military coup in a fictitious situation where there is “a lot of corruption” in government. Other models of governance, from liberal democracy to fascism, can work much more decisively, which has a clear appeal to us at certain times. “Only an enlightened dictator can take the necessary steps to safely navigate the 21st century,” wrote British astronomer Martin Rees. Young people feel it too: Sarah Jacquette, a professor of environmental science, one of Ray’s students “emailed me that she was so upset that she would be willing to submit to a green dictator if she wanted to tackle climate change,” Ray wrote. Scientific American Last year.

But it takes time to make the best decisions ধরনের the kind of democracy that wants to unfold. That’s a lot. Bills must be read, ideally complete and controversial. Citizens deserve time in elections to reflect on the future of their choice. Politicians have to be patient as they try to enforce their campaign promises. And history shows us that dictators are rarely enlightened. Although authoritarian environmentalism may be adept at policy making, [it appears to] There is nothing better than democratic environmentalism for good results, ”he said Economist. In China, for example, the Communist Party’s “policy has worked” yet its actions are inconsistent with its stated goals. By 2021, the country is building coal plants at 60 new locations to avoid power shortages; If used as intended, the trees will remain active until the 2050s.


Source link

Leave feedback about this

  • Quality
  • Price
  • Service


Add Field


Add Field
Choose Image
Choose Video