While it may be increasingly important for people in the United States to consciously consider what they are posting when it comes to their own abortion or loved ones, Haley McMahon, an independent public health researcher who studies abortion access, notes that the goal is to calm the speech. No, to keep people safe.
“I never want to tell anyone that they shouldn’t talk about their experience or that they shouldn’t talk about their experience, because there’s a lot of power in telling abortion stories,” McMahon said. “But I think people need to understand all the information and the risks, and then they can choose where and what to say.”
Know your rights
Researchers emphasize that people in the United States should be aware of their rights and feel safe when dealing with law enforcement. If you are questioned by the police, you can simply say, “I am exercising my right to be silent and I want to talk to an attorney.” Resources such as the Repro Legal Helpline can help you connect with specific legal advice. Additionally, lock your devices with a strong, unique PIN number, keep them locked, and just ask for an attorney if a police officer tries to force you to unlock your device.
McMahon added that in very rare cases of complications with drug abortions, people should not feel pressured to seek treatment from physicians in emergency rooms or other healthcare settings. Simply saying, “I think I’m having an abortion” will suffice.
“People need to understand that it’s impossible to tell the difference between a spontaneous abortion and a drug abortion,” McMahon said. “Medicinal abortions only induce an abortion. And of course, we usually want everyone to disclose their health history to their clinician, but in this case, the treatment is the same, so nothing is lost without disclosing this information. “
Using apps, browsing the web, and using search engines are all activities that can reveal personal details, making it a big challenge for people to control the flow of personal information when researching or attempting an abortion. And often when someone wants an abortion, they have already created data that can reveal their health status. Period-tracking apps, for example, collect data that may seem benign but is clearly sensitive in the context of potential abortion criminalization. In a recent case, the Federal Trade Commission investigated and approved the fertility-tracking app Flow Health for sharing user health data with marketing and analytics companies, including Facebook and Google. And researchers have found numerous examples of health websites conducting targeted ad-tracking by sharing personal data with third parties or by not informing users adequately and violating their privacy policies.
Using a search engine that does not track the data of potentially sensitive users, such as DuckDuckGo, and browser extensions that block web trackers, such as EFF’s privacy badger, all you can take to significantly reduce the amount of time your browsing data runs out. Step. The hand of the technology company. And like analog options if possible to record and store fertility information like a notebook or paper calendar, where you log details of your menstrual cycle.