Elon Musk protected An agreement was reached Monday to buy Twitter for about 44 billion and privatize the company. In his opening remarks about the move, Musk discusses a variety of goals, from “open source algorithms to building trust” to addressing spambots and “authenticating all people.” No further details have been released on how Musk will operate Twitter, but privacy and security advocates say the initial comments paint a mixed picture of where the social media giant could lead its new leadership – and the risks to credible platforms. To protect our personal information.
Unlike Facebook and other platforms that have implemented “real name” policies, Twitter has essentially allowed people to use pseudonyms or remain anonymous, a method that may change under the guise. In addition, Mask will soon be able to access all Twitter user data, including IP addresses and the content of direct messages. Twitter’s DMs are not significantly end-to-end encrypted, which means they can be accessed by anyone who controls the platform. Proponents of end-to-end encryption have long argued that security not only protects users’ data from all sorts of eyeballs, but also keeps them in the long run, regardless of who owns the service.
“Elon Musk is now literally the king of Twitter. There’s nothing stopping him from accessing your direct messages or handing them over to the government – perhaps in a country where Tesla is trying to do business, “said Evan Greer, deputy director of the digital rights group Fight for the Future – for example, the Chinese government, public discourse and Private Communications is notorious for policing in both cases, claiming that technology companies maintain records about their users’ identities even though people are allowed to post using a single handle. Rival super-billionaire Jeff Bezos Highlighted in a tweet thread on Monday, One of the other companies in Mask, Tesla has major business interests in China Twitter, meanwhile, remains a thorn in Beijing’s side.
Like other tech giants, Twitter has spent years building systems Reporting Issues such as the number of official information requests or legal claims for removal of content. Musk has indicated that transparency will be a priority for him on Twitter, but it remains unknown what areas he wants to focus on and what his position will be on issues such as official requests for user data.
In general, digital rights advocates point out that open standards protect speech more effectively than closed ecosystems, as they allow multiple organizations to offer an interchangeable service version that users can choose from. (Think of SMS and email as two examples of such services.) However, in reality, users have jumped on the bandwagon of the relative simplicity and ease of use that platforms like Twitter offer. In recent years, the company has even launched its own exploration program, Project Blue Sky, to look at ways to open Twitter up as an inter-manageable, standard platform rather than a single, closed service.
When Musk talks about “verifying all people,” it’s possible he’s referring to a plan by users to reduce spam bots, say, fill in the captcha before tweeting to prove they’re human. It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post. Worst case scenario, though, is that Musk speaks in favor of a situation where Twitter would collect information about each user to internally confirm that they are an individual or, worse, users only need to have a Twitter account under their legal identity. .